The Star Read online

  The Collected Stories of Arthur C. Clarke

  Volume III: The Star

  Arthur C. Clarke

  Copyright

  The Collected Stories of Arthur C. Clarke

  Volume III: The Star

  Copyright © 2000 by Arthur C. Clarke

  Cover art to the electronic edition copyright © 2012 by RosettaBooks, LLC.

  All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review.

  Electronic edition published 2012 by RosettaBooks, LLC, New York.

  ISBN ePub edition: 9780795329074

  Contents

  Introduction

  The Star

  What Goes Up

  Venture to the Moon

  The Pacifist

  The Reluctant Orchid

  Moving Spirit

  The Defenestration of Ermintrude Inch

  The Ultimate Melody

  The Next Tenants

  Cold War

  Sleeping Beauty

  Security Check

  The Man Who Ploughed the Sea

  Critical Mass

  The Other Side of the Sky

  Let There Be Light

  Out of the Sun

  Cosmic Casanova

  The Songs of Distant Earth

  A Slight Case of Sunstroke

  Who’s There?

  Out of the Cradle, Endlessly Orbiting…

  I Remember Babylon

  Trouble With Time

  Into the Comet

  Summertime on Icarus

  Saturn Rising

  Death and the Senator

  INTRODUCTION

  By 1955 Clarke was in full stride artistically; ‘The Star”, a deliberately blasphemous work rejected by every major market and daringly taken by Larry Shaw at short money for a new magazine Infinity, had an incendiary impact upon the then small enclosure of science fiction and won the second Hugo Award awarded at the 1956 New York World Convention for best short story. (The Hugo had originated as a half-a-joke award in 1953 and was restricted in that first year to a single category of “Best Novel”…Alfred Bester’s The Demolished Man won. Intended to be a one-shot and abandoned by the San Francisco World Convention the next year, the award was revived in a more systematic fashion by the 1955 Cleveland Convention and Eric Frank Russell’s Allagamoosa won in category.) Like “The Nine Billion Names of God”, discussed in the Introduction to Volume II, “The Star” is a landmark short story which over half a century later retains its force and it is known to most readers of science fiction.

  Clarke seems in the penumbra of his late life Knighthood and acceptance by popular culture to be a very poor candidate for the wild man of his time (the British accent may have softened him a bit but J.G. Ballard had a plummy British accent which did not keep him from being regarded by many as a loathsome and dangerous figure) but Clarke was always much wilder than he seemed. If “The Star” is blasphemous, “The Nine Billion Names of God” was not less so although the temperature had been reduced several degrees. Novels like The City and the Stars and its later reworking Against The Fall Of Night were as stunningly bleak and depicted a human future no less spare and entrapped than implied by Childhood’s End but it was perhaps Clarke’s mysticism (and that British reserve) which kept him off the griddle. For whatever reason, his position as a Beloved Elder, encouraged by that Hugo and set prematurely at the age of 39, served him well and was never threatened although his Hugo- and Nebula-winning novel, Rendezvous With Rama (1973), was essentially characterless (it devolved upon the patient, detailed exploration of a mysterious alien spaceship) and the film 2001 opens with human predecessors murdering one another and closes with the destruction through re-alteration of humanity. Of course 2001 was a late 60s film and novelization. Perhaps you truly had to be there.

  By the late 50s, the Big Three of science fiction were Clarke, Asimov and Heinlein. Until Heinlein’s death in 1988 they spent the ensuing decades (in Asimov’s words) “grimly circling one another and wondering who would be the first to die.” Asimov survived Heinlein by almost exactly four years, Clarke survived Asimov by a decade and a half and his reputation was as unassailable at the end as that of the other two. Present on international television as an observer of the 1969 Moon landing and frequent commentator on later expeditions and shuttle launches, he became—with Asimov and Carl Sagan—the living public symbol not only of science fiction but of science itself.

  With all credit to the famous contents of this volume—”The Songs of Distant Earth” became the opening chapters of one of his last and best novels, identically titled, and “I Remember Babylon” reminds us that Clarke invented a communications satellite before his predicted material had been made industrially available—the best story is probably “Death And The Senator”, a quiet and magnificently reasoned exploration of the false confusion of science and politics and the tragic consequences for a humanity almost inevitably trapped there. It is a painful and deeply felt work, hardly emblematic of the stereotypically icy Clarke, and finds unforced tragic outcome which I can compare without embarrassment to King Lear. Not by any means his best known story, it is probably his masterpiece. It represents a world-view—the hopelessness of that societal-scientific interface which in the 40s was declared our ad astra—in direct contravention of John W. Campbell’s but Campbell took it anyway.

  Maybe Campbell didn’t understand the story. That happened more often in Astounding than the acolytes would have you think.

  —May 2012: New Jersey

  The Star

  First published in Infinity Science Fiction, November 1955

  Collected in The Other Side of the Sky

  Written as an entry for a short story competition run by the Observer newspaper, on the subject ‘2500 AD.’, ‘The Star’ wasn’t even a runner-up. However, on magazine publication, it received a Hugo award in 1956. More recently, it was turned into a TV play for Christmas 1985. Although I thought the timing was appropriate, it could hardly be called seasonal fare. I never imagined that one day I would be lecturing in the Vatican.

  It is three thousand light-years to the Vatican. Once, I believed that space could have no power over faith, just as I believed that the heavens declared the glory of God’s handiwork. Now I have seen that handiwork, and my faith is sorely troubled. I stare at the crucifix that hangs on the cabin wall above the Mark VI Computer, and for the first time in my life I wonder if it is no more than an empty symbol.

  I have told no one yet, but the truth cannot be concealed. The facts are there for all to read, recorded on the countless miles of magnetic tape and the thousands of photographs we are carrying back to Earth. Other scientists can interpret them as easily as I can, and I am not one who would condone that tampering with the truth which often gave my order a bad name in the olden days.

  The crew are already sufficiently depressed: I wonder how they will take this ultimate irony. Few of them have any religious faith, yet they will not relish using this final weapon in their campaign against me—that private, good-natured, but fundamentally serious, war which lasted all the way from Earth. It amused them to have a Jesuit as chief astrophysicist: Dr Chandler, for instance, could never get over it (why are medical men such notorious atheists?). Sometimes he would meet me on the observation deck, where the lights are always low so that the stars shine with undiminished glory. He would come up to me in the gloom and stand staring out of the great oval port, while the heavens crawled slowly around us as the ship turned end over end with the residual spin we had never bothered to correct.

  ‘Well, Father,’ he would say at last, ‘it
goes on forever and forever, and perhaps Something made it. But how you can believe that something has a special interest in us and our miserable little world—that just beats me.’ Then the argument would start, while the stars and nebulae would swing around us in silent, endless arcs beyond the flawlessly clear plastic of the observation port.

  It was, I think, the apparent incongruity of my position that caused most amusement to the crew. In vain I would point to my three papers in the Astrophysical Journal, my five in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. I would remind them that my order has long been famous for its scientific works. We may be few now, but ever since the eighteenth century we have made contributions to astronomy and geophysics out of all proportion to our numbers. Will my report on the Phoenix Nebula end our thousand years of history? It will end, I fear, much more than that.

  I do not know who gave the nebula its name, which seems to me a very bad one. If it contains a prophecy, it is one that cannot be verified for several billion years. Even the word nebula is misleading: this is a far smaller object than those stupendous clouds of mist—the stuff of unborn stars—that are scattered throughout the length of the Milky Way. On the cosmic scale, indeed, the Phoenix Nebula is a tiny thing—a tenuous shell of gas surrounding a single star.

  Or what is left of a star…

  The Rubens engraving of Loyola seems to mock me as it hangs there above the spectrophotometer tracings. What would you, Father, have made of this knowledge that has come into my keeping, so far from the little world that was all the universe you knew? Would your faith have risen to the challenge, as mine has failed to do?

  You gaze into the distance, Father, but I have travelled a distance beyond any that you could have imagined when you founded our order a thousand years ago. No other survey ship has been so far from Earth: we are at the very frontiers of the explored universe. We set out to reach the Phoenix Nebula, we succeeded, and we are homeward bound with our burden of knowledge. I wish I could lift that burden from my shoulders, but I call to you in vain across the centuries and the light-years that lie between us.

  On the book you are holding the words are plain to read. AD MAIOREM DEI GLORIAM, the message runs, but it is a message I can no longer believe. Would you still believe it, if you could see what we have found?

  We knew, of course, what the Phoenix Nebula was. Every year, in our galaxy alone, more than a hundred stars explode, blazing for a few hours or days with thousands of times their normal brilliance before they sink back into death and obscurity. Such are the ordinary novae—the commonplace disasters of the universe. I have recorded the spectrograms and light curves of dozens since I started working at the Lunar Observatory.

  But three or four times in every thousand years occurs something beside which even a nova pales into total insignificance.

  When a star becomes a supernova, it may for a little while outshine all the massed suns of the galaxy. The Chinese astronomers watched this happen in AD 1054, not knowing what it was they saw. Five centuries later, in 1572, a supernova blazed in Cassiopeia so brilliantly that it was visible in the daylight sky. There have been three more in the thousand years that have passed since then.

  Our mission was to visit the remnants of such a catastrophe, to reconstruct the events that led up to it, and, if possible, to learn its cause. We came slowly in through the concentric shells of gas that had been blasted out six thousand years before, yet were expanding still. They were immensely hot, radiating even now with a fierce violet light, but were far too tenuous to do us any damage. When the star had exploded, its outer layer had been driven upward with such speed that they had escaped completely from its gravitational field. Now they formed a hollow shell large enough to engulf a thousand solar systems, and at its centre burned the tiny, fantastic object which the star had now become—a White Dwarf, smaller than the Earth, yet weighing a million times as much.

  The glowing gas shells were all around us, banishing the normal night of interstellar space. We were flying into the centre of a cosmic bomb that had detonated millennia ago and whose incandescent fragments were still hurtling apart. The immense scale of the explosion, and the fact that the debris already covered a volume of space many billions of miles across, robbed the scene of any visible movement. It would take decades before the unaided eye could detect any motion of these tortured wisps and eddies of gas, yet the sense of turbulent expansion was overwhelming.

  We had checked our primary drive hours before, and were drifting slowly toward the fierce little star ahead. Once it had been a sun like our own, but it had squandered in a few hours the energy that should have kept it shining for a million years. Now it was a shrunken miser, hoarding its resources as if trying to make amends for its prodigal youth.

  No one seriously expected to find planets. If there had been any before the explosion, they would have been boiled into puffs of vapour, and their substance lost in the greater wreckage of the star itself. But we made the automatic search, as we always do when approaching an unknown sun, and presently we found a single small world circling the star at an immense distance. It must have been the Pluto of this vanished solar system, orbiting on the frontiers of the night. Too far from the central sun ever to have known life, its remoteness had saved it from the fate of all its lost companions.

  The passing fires had seared its rocks and burned away the mantel of frozen gas that must have covered it in the days before the disaster. We landed, and we found the Vault.

  Its builders had made sure that we should. The monolithic marker that stood above the entrance was now a fused stump, but even the first long-range photographs told us that here was the work of intelligence. A little later we detected the continent-wide pattern of radio-activity that had been buried in the rock. Even if the pylon above the Vault had been destroyed, this would have remained, an immovable and all but eternal beacon calling to the stars. Our ship fell toward this gigantic bull’s-eye like an arrow into its target.

  The pylon must have been a mile high when it was built, but now it looked like a candle that had melted down into a puddle of wax. It took us a week to drill through the fused rock, since we did not have the proper tools for a task like this. We were astronomers, not archaeologists, but we could improvise. Our original purpose was forgotten: this lonely monument, reared with such labour at the greatest possible distance from the doomed sun, could have only one meaning. A civilisation that knew it was about to die had made its last bid for immortality.

  It will take us generations to examine all the treasures that were placed in the Vault. They had plenty of time to prepare, for their sun must have given its first warnings many years before the final detonation. Everything that they wished to preserve, all the fruit of their genius, they brought here to this distant world in the days before the end, hoping that some other race would find it and that they would not be utterly forgotten. Would we have done as well, or would we have been too lost in our own misery to give thought to a future we could never see or share?

  If only they had had a little more time! They could travel freely enough between the planets of their own sun, but they had not yet learned to cross the interstellar gulfs, and the nearest solar system was a hundred light-years away. Yet even had they possessed the secret of the Transfinite Drive, no more than a few millions could have been saved. Perhaps it was better thus.

  Even if they had not been so disturbingly human as their sculpture shows, we could not have helped admiring them and grieving for their fate. They left thousands of visual records and the machines for projecting them, together with elaborate pictorial instructions from which it will not be difficult to learn their written language. We have examined many of these records, and brought to life for the first time in six thousand years the warmth and beauty of a civilisation that in many ways must have been superior to our own. Perhaps they only showed us the best, and one can hardly blame them. But their worlds were very lovely, and their cities were built with a grace that matches anything o
f man’s. We have watched them at work and play, and listened to their musical speech sounding across the centuries. One scene is still before my eyes—a group of children on a beach of strange blue sand, playing in the waves as children play on Earth. Curious whiplike trees line the shore, and some very large animal is wading in the shallows yet attracting no attention at all.

  And sinking into the sea, still warm and friendly and life-giving, is the sun that will soon turn traitor and obliterate all this innocent happiness.

  Perhaps if we had not been so far from home and so vulnerable to loneliness, we should not have been so deeply moved. Many of us had seen the ruins of ancient civilisations on other worlds, but they had never affected us so profoundly. This tragedy was unique. It is one thing for a race to fail and die, as nations and cultures have done on Earth. But to be destroyed so completely in the full flower of its achievement, leaving no survivors—how could that be reconciled with the mercy of God?

  My colleagues have asked me that, and I have given what answers I can. Perhaps you could have done better, Father Loyola, but I have found nothing in the Exercitia Spiritualia that helps me here. They were not an evil people: I do not know what gods they worshipped, if indeed they worshipped any. But I have looked back at them across the centuries, and have watched while the loveliness they used their last strength to preserve was brought forth again into the light of their shrunken sun. They could have taught us much: why were they destroyed?

  I know the answers that my colleagues will give when they get back to Earth. They will say that the universe has no purpose and no plan, that since a hundred suns explode every year in our galaxy, at this very moment some race is dying in the depths of space. Whether that race has done good or evil during its lifetime will make no difference in the end: there is no divine justice, for there is no God.

  Yet, of course, what we have seen proves nothing of the sort. Anyone who argues thus is being swayed by emotion, not logic. God has no need to justify His actions to man. He who built the universe can destroy it when He chooses. It is arrogance—it is perilously near blasphemy—for us to say what He may or may not do.